Journal article

When something dehumanizes, it is violent but when it elevates, it is not violent


Research Areas

Currently no objects available


Publication Details

Author list: Oppong Seth

Publication year: 2020

Journal name in source: THEORY & PSYCHOLOGY

Volume number: 30

Issue number: 3

ISSN: 0959-3543



Epistemological violence is alive and problematic. There is no gainsaying that it dehumanizes members of non-Western societies or persons who differ from the Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) Whites. Psychology has a white, affluent, Western skew as the values of the middle-class, Western, Christian, male, Whites (MWCMW) are held as the frame of reference. In this commentary, I first show how Held’s (2020) “true-for and true-about prepositional” frame is useful for understanding the findings that Africans tend to attribute mental disorders to spiritual causes. However, I respond to her major thesis by clarifying the concept of epistemological violence and addressing the concept of “othering” as a form of linguistic violence. I further argue that interpretations of group differences that do not harm the members of the comparison group are not violent; if something promotes social justice, it is no longer violent but an instance of epistemological “positive peace.”


Projects

Currently no objects available


Keywords

Currently no objects available


Documents

Currently no objects available


Last updated on 2022-29-11 at 11:33