Journal article

Modest reduction in adverse birth outcomes following the COVID-19 lockdown.

Authors/Editors

Research Areas

Currently no objects available


Publication Details

Author list: Caniglia, Magosi, Zash, Diseko, Mayondi, Mabuta, Powis, Dryden-Peterson, Mosepele, Luckett, Makhema, Mmalane, Lockman, Shapiro

Publication year: 2021

Journal name in source: American journal of obstetrics and gynecology

Volume number: 224

Issue number: 6

Start page: 615.e1

End page: 615.e12

ISSN: 0002-9378



BACKGROUND\nOBJECTIVE\nSTUDY DESIGN\nRESULTS\nCONCLUSION\nWidespread lockdowns imposed during the coronavirus disease 2019 crisis may impact birth outcomes.\nThis study aimed to evaluate the association between the COVID-19 lockdown and the risk of adverse birth outcomes in Botswana.\nIn response to the coronavirus disease 2019 crisis, Botswana enforced a lockdown that restricted movement within the country. We used data from an ongoing nationwide birth outcomes surveillance study to evaluate adverse outcomes (stillbirth, preterm birth, small-for-gestational-age fetuses, and neonatal death) and severe adverse outcomes (stillbirth, very preterm birth, very-small-for-gestational-age fetuses, and neonatal death) recorded prelockdown (January 1, 2020-April 2, 2020), during lockdown (April 3, 2020-May 7, 2020), and postlockdown (May 8, 2020-July 20, 2020). Using difference-in-differences analyses, we compared the net change in each outcome from the prelockdown to lockdown periods in 2020 relative to the same 2 periods in 2017-2019 with the net change in each outcome from the prelockdown to postlockdown periods in 2020 relative to the same 2 periods in 2017-2019.\nIn this study, 68,448 women delivered a singleton infant in 2017-2020 between January 1 and July 20 and were included in our analysis (mean [interquartile range] age of mothers, 26 [22-32] years). Across the included calendar years and periods, the risk of any adverse outcome ranged from 27.92% to 31.70%, and the risk of any severe adverse outcome ranged from 8.40% to 11.38%. The lockdown period was associated with a 0.81 percentage point reduction (95% confidence interval, -2.95% to 1.30%) in the risk of any adverse outcome (3% relative reduction) and a 0.02 percentage point reduction (95% confidence interval, -0.79% to 0.75%) in the risk of any severe adverse outcome (0% relative reduction). The postlockdown period was associated with a 1.72 percentage point reduction (95% confidence, -3.42% to 0.02%) in the risk of any adverse outcome (5% relative reduction) and a 1.62 percentage point reduction (95% confidence interval, -2.69% to -0.55%) in the risk of any severe adverse outcome (14% relative reduction). Reductions in adverse outcomes were largest among women with human immunodeficiency virus and among women delivering at urban delivery sites, driven primarily by reductions in preterm birth and small-for-gestational-age fetuses.\nAdverse birth outcomes decreased from the prelockdown to postlockdown periods in 2020, relative to the change during the same periods in 2017-2019. Our findings may provide insights into associations between mobility and birth outcomes in Botswana and other low- and middle-income countries.


Projects

Currently no objects available


Keywords

Currently no objects available


Documents

Currently no objects available


Last updated on 2025-27-11 at 14:16